Skip to main content

Publications


Peer-Reviewed Publications
 
1. “Scientology’s Legal System” (2019) 21:1 Marburg Journal of Religion 1
2. “The Eternal Commitment: Scientology's Billion-Year Contract” (2020) 1:2 International Journal of Coercion, Abuse, and Manipulation 82
3. “Access to Inclusive Education for Students with Autism: An Analysis of Canada's Compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities” (2020) 9:5 Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 328
4. “Law and Green Eggs and Ham” (2020) 6:2 Anamorphosis: International Journal of Law and Literature 431
5. “Case Comment: Garcia v Church of Scientology Flag Service Organization” (2020) 86:2 Arbitration 211
6. “The Social Perils and Promise of Remote Work” (2020) 4:S Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy 63
7. “Tackling the COVID-19 Pandemic” (2020) 43:2 Manitoba Law Journal 1
8. “Incentivising Employment during the COVID-19 Pandemic” (2020) 8:3 The Theory and Practice of Legislation 355 
9. “Work, Family and Identity” in Daniel Wheatley, Irene Hardill & Sarah Buglass, eds, Handbook of Research on Remote Work and Worker Well-Being in the Post-COVID-19 Era (Hershey: IGI, 2021) 329
10. “Cultivating Humility” (2021) 55:3 The Law Teacher 364
11. “Popping the Cap” (2021) 42:1 Health Law in Canada 14
12. “Ending Poverty” [2021] Ottawa Law Review Blog
13. “Free Vaccines and Lost Privileges” [2022] Ottawa Law Review Blog (forthcoming)

Articles in U.S. Law Reviews

14. Pornhub: Opening the Floodgates?, 11 Houston Law Review Off the Record 54 (2021)
15. COVID-19 and the Future of Work, Denver Law Review Forum (2021)
16. Religious Legitimacy, 90 UMKC Law Review 347 (2021)
17. Black Lives Matter: On Challenging the Soul of Legal Education, 54 Texas Tech Law Review 89 (2022)
18. Moral Panic and the War on Drugs, 20 UNH Law Review __ (forthcoming 2022)

Other Scholarly Publications

19. “What Is the True Purpose of Quebec's Bill 21?” (2020) 9:3 Directions 1
20. “Quelle est la réelle raison d'être de la loi 21?” (2020) 9:3 Directions 1 (written and published in French and English)
21. “Popping the Cap” [2020] McGill Journal of Law and Health Online (case comment)
22. “COVID-19: Is the Cure 'Worse Than the Problem Itself'?” [2020] McGill Journal of Law and Health Online
24. “'It Doesn’t Work!': The Symbolic Aspect of Law, From the Criminal Law to Bill 21” (2020) 9:6 Directions 1 (written and published in French and English)
25. “Structural Change or Collective Amnesia?” (2020) 57:4 Alberta Law Review 1053 (book review)
26. “Recension : L'action collective : ses succès et ses défis” (2020) 61:4 Les Cahiers de droit 1155 (book review)
27. “Tackling the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Paths Forward” in Proceedings of the 1st World Pandemic Research Network (WPRN) Conference on the Impacts of the Covid-19 Pandemic (forthcoming 2022)

Briefs

28. Brief of Professor Phil Lord in Opposition to the Proposed Class Action Settlement in Leung v. Uber Canada Inc. et al. (filed February 2022; oral argument March 2022)

Working Papers

1. “Fairer Class Action Settlements”

You can also read my research statement.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Religions Hoard Their Cash?

People seem to be outraged that religions hoard their cash. While this is in no way a recent phenomenon, the outrage is. The bottom line is that some religious organisations are very, very rich  –  and have been for a very long time.  The Catholic Church, at the helm of the most popular organised religion on Earth, settled sexual assault cases for billions (with a  b ) of dollars. Scientology is estimated to own between one and three billion dollars (net) worth of property. We recently learned that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (known, to its dismay, as the Mormon Church) owns an investment portfolio worth 100 billion dollars. The Church only has some 16 million members. It also takes in some 7 billion dollars each year. (The Church mandates tithing of 10% of its members' gross income.) Recently, some have made that argument that churches should not benefit from a tax exemption if they hoard their cash.  It is true that churches are tax exempt. Their members
7 comments
Read more

Nicholas Kasirer Appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada

As a McGill Law alumn (LL.B./B.C.L. '18), I was pleased to hear that Nicholas Kasirer was nominated to the Supreme Court of Canada.  Justice Kasirer follows in a long line of McGill Law alumni who have dedicated significant portions of their careers to public service. He joins other exceptional leaders such as current Minister of Justice David Lametti ( LL.B./B.C.L. '89) and current Minister of the Environment Catherine McKenna  ( LL.B./B.C.L. '99). Justice Kasirer  graduated from the Faculty ( LL.B./B.C.L. '85) and served as a professor for over a decade. He was later nominated Dean of the Faculty, a position which he occupied for six years. Following his deanship,  Justice Kasirer was nominated to the Quebec Court of Appeal.  Justice Kasirer is an exceptional scholar and teacher. He is thoughtful and humble - as thoroughly reflected in his  judicial questionnaire . I have no doubt that he will, in his new role, further contribute to the developmen
4 comments
Read more

What Just Happened in the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States just issued a very significant decision. Lots of people are saying lots of things about it. As usual, these range from informative to worryingly incorrect. This is my attempt to simplify what just happened (and what did not), and to give a few pointers on how other lawyers might see the decision.  I must preface this discussion by noting that I am beyond thrilled to see everyday people make the effort to read and engage with a  Supreme Court  decision. I encourage you to read the decision in its entirety. The Justices made an effort (as they now generally do) to use accessible and clear language. We should all be able to understand  Supreme Court  decisions, and you probably will. First, here's what the Supreme Court did not do. It did not outlaw abortion because it can't. Women will still be able to get an abortion, somewhere, sometime (more on that later). In 1973, the Supreme Court had issued another decision, Roe v Wade. You've sur
Post a Comment
Read more